[Username Protected]

2010 Phenom 100.
S/n: 50000138

Fresh 120 month inspection. New paint & interior done in 2019, immaculate maintenance and records, operated on Part 135 certificate most of its life. GoGo WiFi, WAAS, ADS-B out & in. EMB-500 Type Rating Training available.

Total time: 8000


Engines:
Pratt & Whitney PW617F (no engine program).
PCE-LC0251: 510 h left to HSI; 2250 h left till overhaul.
PCE-LC0333: 530 h left to HSI; 2280 h left till overhaul.


Avionics:
• G1000
• WAAS
• LPV approach capable
•ADSBout&in
• Gogo WiFi (ATG5000)
• Satellite phone wired to G1000


Gear overhaul is NOT done and is NOT required for Part 91 ops.

[Username Protected]

Attachment 5872
Attachment 5873
Attachment 5874

[Username Protected]

Gear overhaul is NOT done and is NOT required for Part 91 ops.

I'm very surprised, have not heard before 91 ops not needed. What you saying you made a 10y without landing gear overhaul?

(Username Protected)

[Username Protected]

I'm very surprised, have not heard before 91 ops not needed. What you saying you made a 10y without landing gear overhaul?

(Username Protected)

Yes. For part 91 ops inspections are mandatory, overhauls are only a recommendation. There are a lot of FAA legal consul interpretations in regards to this matter. I'm attaching one of them.
Any manufacturer will tell you it is mandatory all day long, but they have no regulating authority. FAA does.

[Username Protected]

I believe you're misinterpreting the vast majority of that letter. Yes, there is no regulatory requirement to perform or incorporate an SB. However, the gear inspection is clearly a scheduled maintenance requirement. Even the letter states that its "axiomatic that defects found during inspection must be corrected." The AMM and SMR lists all the gear components as inspections with a 120 month requirement and not SB's. To inspect, they have to be removed and opened up to see if anything has deteriorated. I've put this situation and letter in front of an A&P plus an aircraft broker and they're nowhere near the side of how you read this.

[Username Protected]

I believe you're misinterpreting the vast majority of that letter. Yes, there is no regulatory requirement to perform or incorporate an SB. However, the gear inspection is clearly a scheduled maintenance requirement. Even the letter states that its "axiomatic that defects found during inspection must be corrected." The AMM and SMR lists all the gear components as inspections with a 120 month requirement and not SB's. To inspect, they have to be removed and opened up to see if anything has deteriorated. I've put this situation and letter in front of an A&P plus an aircraft broker and they're nowhere near the side of how you read this.

Bent, in your opinion jet engine overhaul is legally required?

[Username Protected]

Hey (Username Protected)-

Is this airplane still available or has it been sold?

[Username Protected]

Sold. I have a Premier 1A available for $1.2M if you are interested.